TRUMPMOBILES.COM LOOK IT UP!

President Donald Trump, your $29 Billion dollar law affects USA voters. As a father, grand and great grandfather, I'll wager my life and life-savings to help Veterans and voters!

Converting existing cars to electric is expensive! While Paul Martin and others may disagree yet, at age 71, a father, grand and great grandfather, I will wager all of my entire life holdings to have this reach President Trump's $29B mistake. Yes, I will wager it all, post this to GreenTV.com and lots of other places as we need to work together, not far apart.

When Gregory Coles designed and built President Biden's BidenMobile.com, this would be a simple call, line up an appointment, and talk things like this. However, with you being so wrapped up in so much, I will wager all and be here for Republicans, Democrats and all to get the two things most want. Great transportation (like conversions to electric) and access to the thousands of years that the very Green plant has shown to be highly effective. In my case, it became a mandatory medical procedure during my two battles with Cancer and I am still here and doing this with all we have!

Selling nearly all of our nearly 100 year old assets to make this one dream the truth may take its toll yet in all of that time, we worked to bring what we know to the table. TRUTH, want and need. And in the case of your $29B+ law, you will see the many USA Veterans, Mom and Pops and regular folks working hard to obey the law, make a few dollars and help others.

Someone has to stand up and the only way to reach Trump (unlike Biden who we can call) is to create Trump Mobiles, do LOTS of work and then pay whatever it takes to see the outcomes BEFORE 11.13.2026! And what better way to do this than to build one (or many) Trump Mobiles, fully electric and what you would expect for most of your voters, even many who did not support you!

And no, not the TrumpMobile.com owned by high-ups. Ours is TrumpMobiles.com

For Marco and friends!

Hemp Restrictions in FY2026 Agriculture Appropriations

In statute, hemp is currently defined to mean "the plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of that plant, including the seeds thereof and all derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers, whether growing or not, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol [THC] concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis" (7 U.S.C. §1639o). There are hundreds of chemical compounds and cannabinoids in the cannabis plant.

The House and Senate committee-reported bills would expand the existing statutory definition of hemp to include industrial hemp products and exclude certain hemp-derived cannabinoid products. These terms would be defined as follows:

• Industrial hemp would be defined as hemp grown for "non-cannabinoid" uses, including for fiber or for grain/seed (e.g., use as a whole grain, oil, cake, nut, or hull) or for immature plants (e.g., "microgreens or other edible leaf products"), as well as hemp grown for research purposes or as a viable seed to produce industrial hemp.

• Hemp-derived cannabinoid product would be defined as "any intermediate or final product derived from hemp (other than industrial hemp), that ... contains cannabinoids in any form; and ... is intended for human or animal use through any means of application or administration, such as inhalation, ingestion, or topical application."

• 
  

The committee provisions would exclude from the hemp definition any cannabinoids that are non-naturally occurring and synthesized or manufactured compounds. The provisions also would exclude from the definition any viable seeds from the cannabis plant that exceed a total THC (including tetrahydrocannabinolic acid [THCA]) of 0.3% in the plant on a dry weight basis. Other changes would provide that the allowable limits of THC—the leading psychoactive cannabinoid in the cannabis plant—be determined on the basis of its total THC, including THCA, instead of delta-9 THC. This would codify the regulatory practice established in USDA's 2021 final hemp regulations. Other existing statutory language regarding hemp "derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers, whether growing or not" would remain unchanged.

The committee provisions would exclude "any hemp-derived cannabinoid products containing ... quantifiable amounts" of THC as determined by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in consultation with the USDA Secretary. The House committee report would require that FDA establish a task force to "provide input on determining the level of quantifiable amounts of [THC] or other cannabinoids in hemp-derived cannabinoid products" and recommend "clear, science-based guidance to ensure product safety, consumer confidence, and regulatory clarity" for hemp-derived products (H.Rept. 119-172). In determining quantifiable amounts, the House committee states it "does not intend for industrial or non-intoxicating hemp-derived cannabinoid products with trace or insignificant amounts of THC to be affected." While neither the House nor Senate describes what constitutes an intoxicating hemp-derived cannabinoid product, these proposed changes would effectively redefine hemp to include any industrial hemp product but include only hemp cannabinoid products that are naturally occurring, non-synthetic, and nonintoxicating. The Senate committee report would require FDA to report on projected market impacts and stakeholder engagement, including information on uniform packaging, labeling, testing, and adverse event reporting requirements (S.Rept. 119-37).

Efforts to close the hemp loophole reflect recommendations of the Cannabis Regulators Association (CANNRA) and attorneys general in several states. CANNRA has identified three loopholes—0.3% loophole, THCA loophole, and derivatives loophole—that it asserts are being used to justify the sale of unregulated hemp-derived cannabinoid products despite some products being widely considered to be intoxicating and to pose public safety and health risks. The committee provisions would address these loopholes by requiring hemp be tested on the basis of total THC (including THCA) and excluding certain intoxicating hemp-derived cannabinoid products that would be considered controlled substances, subject to DEA enforcement. Industry groups contend the provisions would "dismantle" the U.S. hemp industry.

Yes, this will affect many BIG names in the beverage industry to Barbara Filippone who had lost much to the fabric industry yet like Barbara and her team we too are not giving up, just giving hope!

And good day to all! Make sure you get what you need and want! Just click the image and enjoy! And THIS will survive the $29 Billion-dollar USA markets for non-medical uses and will wager my life on this!

And make sure to read Fuel2Electric's link on converting existing vehicles to clean and Greened! Why Classic Cars Become More Loved as Fewer People Can Maintain Them